Dienogest

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Dienogest
  2. Dienogest: From Endometriosis to Amenorrhea
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Saudi Arabia Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Dienogest: From Endometriosis to Amenorrhea

One-Sentence Summary

Dienogest is a fourth-generation progestin widely used for endometriosis treatment, exerting its effects through progesterone receptor agonism and suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis.

The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for Amenorrhea, with 4 clinical trials and 6 publications currently associated with this direction — however, a critical interpretive caveat applies: amenorrhea in this context is a well-documented pharmacological side effect of dienogest (occurring in 50–70% of users), not an established therapeutic target, suggesting the model may have captured a reversed causal relationship.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Endometriosis (established from clinical trial and literature context; no Saudi Arabia registration)
Predicted New Indication Amenorrhea
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.71%
Evidence Level L3
Saudi Arabia Market Status Not marketed
Number of Authorizations 0
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Dienogest acts as a selective progesterone receptor agonist with high oral bioavailability and minimal androgenic activity. Its primary mechanism involves suppression of the HPG axis — reducing LH and FSH secretion, lowering circulating estrogen, and directly inhibiting ectopic endometrial cell proliferation and survival. This makes it highly effective for endometriosis-associated pain and lesion control.

As a direct consequence of this HPG suppression, dienogest reliably induces amenorrhea in a substantial proportion of treated women. The 2026 mechanistic study (PMID 41329046) explicitly states that "inducing amenorrhoea and a hypoestrogenic environment" is the intended therapeutic objective of dienogest in endometriosis — confirming that amenorrhea is the pharmacological mechanism, not the target indication. TxGNN's biological knowledge graph almost certainly captured this strong co-occurrence between dienogest and amenorrhea and scored it as a repurposing signal.

Critically, the causal direction is reversed from a repurposing standpoint. Treating primary amenorrhea (hypothalamic, pituitary, or structural origin) or secondary amenorrhea with additional HPG suppression would be pharmacologically counterproductive in most etiologies. A narrow diagnostic use case exists — the progesterone challenge test for assessing estrogen priming in secondary amenorrhea workup — but this is a diagnostic tool, not a therapeutic indication. Before any further development consideration, the specific amenorrhea subtype and clinical context must be defined.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT04495855 N/A Completed 968 Real-world observational study of dienogest (Visanne) for endometriosis in routine clinical practice; amenorrhea tracked as a secondary safety endpoint, reflecting a known side effect rather than a therapeutic target
NCT02425462 N/A Completed 895 Prospective cohort study in Asian women with endometriosis assessing quality-of-life improvement and long-term safety; amenorrhea rate reported as a tolerability finding
NCT07164183 Phase 3 Recruiting 290 Non-inferiority Phase 3 trial comparing Indinol Forto® 200 mg vs. Visanne 2 mg for endometriosis treatment; amenorrhea not a primary endpoint
NCT07204093 N/A Active, not recruiting 138 Comparison of transdermal estradiol add-back with dienogest vs. drospirenone for bone protection in endometriosis; designed to mitigate dienogest-induced hypoestrogenism, not to treat amenorrhea

Important: All 4 identified trials target endometriosis as the primary indication. Amenorrhea appears exclusively as a secondary safety or tolerability endpoint — reflecting a drug-induced side effect — in none of these trials is amenorrhea the therapeutic target being treated.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
39090694 2024 Systematic Review / Meta-analysis BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Bayesian analysis of dienogest adverse effects; irregular bleeding and amenorrhea confirmed as among the most prevalent adverse events, quantifying their pharmacological — not therapeutic — role
34405378 2022 Narrative Review Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders Comprehensive review of hormonal treatments for endometriosis; frames estrogen dependency and progesterone resistance as the core disease drivers, providing mechanistic context for dienogest's HPG suppression strategy
41329046 2026 Clinical / Mechanistic Study European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Demonstrates high inhibition ratio and transformation index for 2 mg dienogest; explicitly identifies inducing amenorrhea and a hypoestrogenic environment as the treatment objective in endometriosis, confirming reversed causation relative to the TxGNN prediction
29161960 2018 Cohort Study Reproductive Sciences Retrospective cohort of 514 women with ovarian endometrioma on long-term dienogest (>12 months); amenorrhea and breakthrough bleeding patterns documented as key long-term tolerability outcomes
34918698 2021 Case Report Medicine Case report of ovarian granulosa cell tumor in a PCOS patient; tangential association with amenorrhea context, no direct relevance to dienogest repurposing
40543564 2025 Review Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Advanced visualization for Müllerian anomalies; relevant as obstructive anomalies are a structural cause of primary amenorrhea — where hormonal therapy such as dienogest would have no role

Saudi Arabia Market Information

Dienogest currently has no approved product registrations with the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA). No marketed formulations exist in Saudi Arabia at this time, and accordingly no authorized indication data is available.

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The TxGNN model has identified a pharmacologically real — but directionally reversed — association: dienogest reliably induces amenorrhea as a high-incidence side effect (50–70%) through HPG axis suppression, rather than serving as a treatment for amenorrhea as a primary disease state. All 4 clinical trials and the 6 publications identified support the endometriosis indication, with amenorrhea appearing only as a secondary safety endpoint. There is no clinical trial or literature evidence supporting dienogest as a therapeutic agent for primary or secondary amenorrhea of other etiologies, and pharmacological reasoning suggests it would be counterproductive in most amenorrhea subtypes.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Formal clarification of the clinical question: is there a specific amenorrhea subtype (e.g., progesterone challenge test in secondary amenorrhea diagnosis) where dienogest's HPG-suppressive effect could be used constructively?
  • SFDA product registration and local package insert retrieval to complete safety evaluation (currently a blocking data gap)
  • MOA documentation from DrugBank to support mechanistic plausibility analysis
  • If the primary endometriosis indication is pursued first (as recommended), the amenorrhea repurposing signal can be reconsidered in the context of any future indication expansion after market entry is established

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). This report is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.